A Bibliometric Analysis of EEG-Based Brain Training and Robotic Feedback Integration in Motor Control Research

Author


Maria Caroline Wojtila(1Mail), Gerard Anthonius Juswanto(2), Anne Gracia(3), Maria Caroline Wojtila(4), Tim Valentino Lakusa(5), Rivo Panji Yudha(6), Sandra Yap Donggorables(7), RM Pangeran Saleh(8), Retnaningsih R(9), Ujan Taufik Hidayah(10), Jumraini Tammase(11), Dodik Tugasworo(12), Syahrul S(13),
(1) ,
(2) ,
(3) ,
(4) ,
(5) ,
(6) ,
(7) ,
(8) ,
(9) ,
(10) ,
(11) ,
(12) ,
(13) ,

Mail Corresponding Author
Article Analytic
  [File Size: 634KB]  Language: en
Available online: 2025-08-02  |  Published : 2025-08-02
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Caroline Wojtila
Article can trace at:

Article Metrics

Abstract Views: 72 times PDF Downloaded: 44 times

Abstract


Background and Objective: The integration of EEG-based brain training with robotic feedback systems represents an emerging paradigm in motor control research and neurorehabilitation. This study provides the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis to map the intellectual structure, research trends, and collaboration patterns in this rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field.Methods: A systematic bibliometric analysis was conducted using Scopus and Web of Science databases, identifying 197 relevant publications from 2015 to 2025. Data extraction included complete bibliographic records, citation metrics, and keyword assignments. Analysis was performed using VOSviewer for network visualization, Biblioshiny for comprehensive bibliometric computations, and statistical analysis for temporal trends, geographic distribution, author productivity, and thematic clustering.Results: The field demonstrated exponential growth with peak output in 2022 (40 publications, 185.7% increase). Publications achieved exceptional citation impact (average 49.0 citations per paper) with 19 papers receiving >100 citations. Five distinct research clusters were identified: EEG-based brain training, robotic rehabilitation systems, clinical stroke applications, brain-computer interface technology, and motor control learning. Singapore emerged as the leading research hub (16.2% of publications) despite small geographic size, while international collaboration rates (69.2%) significantly exceeded typical biomedical research patterns. Stroke rehabilitation dominated clinical applications, with open-access venues (particularly Frontiers journals) representing primary publication channels.Conclusions: EEG-robotic integration research has successfully transitioned from an emerging area to an established interdisciplinary field with sustained research momentum and global collaborative networks. The findings provide strategic guidance for research institutions, funding agencies, and policymakers, recommending prioritization of international partnerships, coordinated infrastructure development, and focused clinical implementation in stroke rehabilitation while expanding to other neurological conditions.

Keywords


EEG; brain training; robotic feedback; motor control; bibliometric analysis; brain-computer interface; neurorehabilitation; neurofeedback

References


Ang, K. K., Chua, K. S. G., Phua, K. S., Wang, C., & ... (2015). A randomized controlled trial of EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface robotic rehabilitation for stroke. Clinical EEG and . https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059414522229

Baniqued, P. D. E., Stanyer, E. C., Awais, M., & ... (2021). Braincomputer interface robotics for hand rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review. In of neuroengineering and . Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00820-8

Bauer, R., Fels, M., Vukeli?, M., Ziemann, U., & Gharabaghi, A. (2015). Bridging the gap between motor imagery and motor execution with a brainrobot interface. Neuroimage. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811914010180

Bhagat, N. A., Venkatakrishnan, A., Abibullaev, B., & ... (2016). Design and optimization of an EEG-based brain machine interface (BMI) to an upper-limb exoskeleton for stroke survivors. In Frontiers in . frontiersin.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00122

Cervera, M. A., Soekadar, S. R., Ushiba, J., & ... (2018). Brain?computer interfaces for post?stroke motor rehabilitation: a meta?analysis. Annals of Clinical . https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.544

Chen, J., Xia, Y., Zhou, X., Rosas, E. V., Thomas, A., & ... (2023). fNIRS-EEG BCIs for motor rehabilitation: a review. In Bioengineering. mdpi.com. https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/10/12/1393

Cheng, N., Phua, K. S., Lai, H. S., Tam, P. K., & ... (2020). Brain-computer interface-based soft robotic glove rehabilitation for stroke. IEEE Transactions . https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9055030/

Curran, C. S., & Leker, J. (2011). Patent indicators for monitoring convergence - examples from NFF and ICT. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.021

D?az, C. F. B. (2023). Brain-Computer Interface for Lower-Limb Neurorehabilitation: From Signal Analysis to Practical Applications. sappg.ufes.br. https://sappg.ufes.br/tese_drupal/tese_17478_Disserta%E7%E3o de Mestrado - Cristian Felipe Blanco D%EDaz.pdf

Fleury, M., Lioi, G., Barillot, C., & Lcuyer, A. (2020). A survey on the use of haptic feedback for brain-computer interfaces and neurofeedback. In Frontiers in neuroscience. frontiersin.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00528

Jo, S. H., Jung, J. H., Yang, M. J., Lee, Y., & ... (2022). EEG-EMG hybrid real-time classification of hand grasp and release movements intention in chronic stroke patients. 2022 International . https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9896592/

Mane, R., Chouhan, T., & Guan, C. (2020). BCI for stroke rehabilitation: motor and beyond. In Journal of neural engineering. iopscience.iop.org. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aba162

Padfield, N., Zabalza, J., Zhao, H., Masero, V., & Ren, J. (2019). EEG-based brain-computer interfaces using motor-imagery: Techniques and challenges. In Sensors. mdpi.com. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/6/1423

Sitaram, R., Ros, T., Stoeckel, L., Haller, S., & ... (2017). Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nature Reviews . https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn.2016.164.pdf

Supriyati, Y., Sati, D., & Yudha, R. P. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in the Scientific Approach to Physics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2377/1/012075

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer Manual version 1.6.16. Univeristeit Leiden, November, 152.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.